Metal 3D Printing - Slm / Dmls Metal 3D Printing - Slm / Dmls,3d Printing Service Metal ,Metal 3d Printing Service Stainless Steel,3d Printing Service Metal Aluminum Ningbo Rongna Technology Co.,Ltd , https://www.service-machining.com
METAL 3D Printing - SLM / DMLS
The two technologies have many similarities: both use laser scanning and selectively fuse (or melt) metal powder particles, glue them together and build them layer by layer. Similarly, the materials used in both processes are granular metals.
The difference between SLM and DMLS is due to the basis (and patents) of the particle bonding process: SLM uses metal powder with a single melting temperature and completely melts the particles, while in DMLS, the powder is composed of materials with variable melting points at high temperatures Fusion at the molecular level.
Bering 3D provides 3D printing services for various metal materials such as stainless steel, die steel, titanium alloy, aluminum alloy, and bronze.
The EU's Fit for 55 package is a major step forward in aligning European legislation with its climate goals. At the heart of this initiative is the **Alternative Fuels Infrastructure Regulation (AFIR)**, which focuses on expanding electric vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure across the continent. While the AFIR aims to support the transition to cleaner transportation, its current proposed targets may not be enough to fully realize the potential of electric mobility as a driver of the energy transition.
According to the AFIR, each EU country must ensure a certain level of charging infrastructure per EV registered within its borders. However, these targets are based on current EV numbers and may not account for future growth or regional differences. In countries with low EV adoption, the minimum charger-to-vehicle ratio could result in insufficient infrastructure, deterring drivers from switching to electric. Meanwhile, in countries where EVs are already popular, the same targets might already be met, offering no incentive for further development.
This "one-size-fits-all" approach risks slowing down the overall rollout of electric mobility across Europe. A more flexible strategy—tailored to the specific needs of each country—could better address range anxiety and accelerate the shift to electric vehicles. By setting higher targets for countries with slower EV uptake, the EU can help build confidence among drivers and encourage greater adoption.
Moreover, the AFIR should not only focus on quantity but also on quality. Charging infrastructure must be reliable, accessible, and integrated into the broader energy system. This includes supporting renewable energy sources and ensuring that charging networks are scalable to meet future demand.
In conclusion, while the Fit for 55 package is a positive step, it needs to evolve to reflect the diverse realities of EV adoption across Europe. A more adaptive and targeted approach will not only boost electrification but also create a stronger, more competitive market for electric mobility.